<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research and Writing Tools for the Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lylejohnson.name/blog/2006/07/27/research-and-writing-tools-for-the-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lylejohnson.name/blog/2006/07/27/research-and-writing-tools-for-the-mac/</link>
	<description>Covering Software Development with Ruby and FXRuby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:18:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://lylejohnson.name/blog/2006/07/27/research-and-writing-tools-for-the-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lylejohnson.name/blog/?p=153#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>Journaler definetely seems more simple. The large robust applications can often offer more than you need and slow you down if all you want is simple and straight forward. However, if you&#039;re looking for a more-streamlined option, that dev technology looks like a nice choice. - ben @ http://rubyonrailsblog.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journaler definetely seems more simple. The large robust applications can often offer more than you need and slow you down if all you want is simple and straight forward. However, if you&#8217;re looking for a more-streamlined option, that dev technology looks like a nice choice. &#8211; ben @ <a href="http://rubyonrailsblog.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rubyonrailsblog.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

